Who is carrierzone.com

Show original message. Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message. Hi, Three of my XP computers are making a port 80 connection to a site at Bob I.

Tom [Pepper] Willett. Well, did you visit that web site? It's odd to see that connection pop 5 with 5 threads at once. Post reply. Ask a Question Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question? Ask a Question. Feb 27, Make IIS 5. Feb 7, Hard Drives Disappear. Dec 4, Sep 5, Mar 4, While I haven't dealt directly with carrierzone most of these kind of services I've dealt with are used only for filtering and relaying messages and don't provide any kind of public facing storage and retrieval.

If you pointed the MX records to this service without having an active subscription with them the messages would either go nowhere or end up bouncing back depending on the setup.

My recommendation would be to set up a custom domain entry with Google or the like. It's relatively straight forward and provides some long term stability. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group.

Create a free Team What is Teams? Learn more. Who is carrierzone and what do they have to do with email through a custom domain? Asked 9 years, 3 months ago. Active 9 years, 3 months ago. Missing nameservers reported by your nameservers OK. All nameservers returned by the parent server h. RFC 2. Different subnets OK. Looks like you have nameservers on different subnets!

IPs of nameservers are public Ok. Looks like the IP addresses of your nameservers are public. This is a good thing and useful even if UDP connections are used by default.

Different autonomous systems OK. It seems you are safe from a single point of failure. You must be careful about this and try to have nameservers on different locations as it can prevent a lot of problems if one nameserver goes down. Stealth NS records sent Ok.

All your nameservers agree that your SOA serial number is This value seems a little high. You should consider decreasing this value to about hours as recommanded by RFC This value was used to serve as a default TTL for records without a given TTL value and now is used for negative caching indicates how long a resolver may cache the negative answer.