Satake K Advances in earthquake and tsunami sciences and disaster risk reduction since the Indian ocean tsunami. Geosc Lett 1 1 Bull Seismol Soc Am 2B — Shimozono T, Sato S Coastal vulnerability analysis during tsunami-induced levee overflow and breaching by a high-resolution flood model.
Coastal Eng — Pure Appl Geophys 6—8 — Earthq Spectra 22 S3 — In: Satake K ed Tsunamis: case studies and recent developments, 23rd edn. Proc R Soc Lon A — Nat Hazards Earth Sys Sci — Geophys Res Lett L Earth Space Sci — Welch P The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: a method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms.
Wells DL, Coppersmith KJ New empirical relationships among magnitude, rupture length, rupture width, rupture area, and surface displacement. Bull Seismol Soc Am 84 4 — Download references. MH prepared the initial draft, conducted tsunami simulations and spectral analysis, and produced relevant figures and texts.
TI performed aftershocks analysis, produced Fig. ACY provided critical insights for the tsunami source, peak tsunami coastal amplitudes, wave motions, and the performance of the TSPs. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The manuscript benefited from constructive comments by Prof. Kenji Satake Editor-in-Chief before submission for which we are sincerely grateful. MH thanks Dr. Gerassimos A. The manuscript benefited from review comments made by three reviewers appointed by the journal Dr.
Stefano Lorito and two anonymous reviewers for which we are sincerely grateful. Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar. Correspondence to Mohammad Heidarzadeh. Reprints and Permissions. Heidarzadeh, M. Bodrum—Kos Turkey—Greece Mw 6. Download citation.
Received : 07 September Accepted : 06 December Published : 16 December Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:. Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search all SpringerOpen articles Search. Download PDF. Background Turkey—Greece border in the Mediterranean Sea ruptured to a strong earthquake on July 20, Full size image.
Data and methods Two tide gauge records of the tsunami were used in this study at Bodrum Turkey and Syros Greece located at distances of 13 and km from the epicenter, respectively see Fig. Tsunami waveforms and physical properties Figure 3 presents the original tsunami records Fig. Source model Tsunami simulations and comparison with observed waveforms are presented in Fig. The main findings and concluding remarks are: 1. Accessed on 4 Dec Satake K Linear and nonlinear computations of the Nicaragua earthquake tsunami.
Pure Appl Geophys — Article Google Scholar Satake K Advances in earthquake and tsunami sciences and disaster risk reduction since the Indian ocean tsunami. Accessed on 4 Dec Download references. Acknowledgements The manuscript benefited from constructive comments by Prof. Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" for more info. Manage consent. Close Privacy Overview Learn more about the cookies on this website. Necessary cookies are essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
The YouTube videos we display also include cookies automatically which we are unable to offer a feature to block. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics". The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary". Opinion of Advocate General Kokott delivered on 20 July European Commission v Republic of Austria.
Digital reports Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section. It goes without saying that official documents such as biometric passports, identity cards, driving licences and residence permits must be manufactured in compliance with particular secrecy and security requirements, as the issue of such documents is an expression of the exercise of fundamental State functions.
The documents are used as part of everyday life and the importance of public confidence in their authenticity and veracity is not to be underestimated. Consequently, highest priority is given to security of supply, protection against counterfeiting and responsible handling of these documents, including of data processed in their manufacture, and abuse must be effectively prevented. In these infringement proceedings, however, the Court will be required to clarify whether such considerations justify entrusting the manufacture of such documents, without any procurement procedure, exclusively to a certain undertaking which is considered to be particularly trustworthy.
Going beyond the case at issue, the present proceedings are also significant because in them the Court will once again shed light on the leeway available to Member States to derogate from EU law where they rely on their essential national security interests within the meaning of Article 1 TFEU.
At a time when the threat from international terrorism and organised crime and the question of effective control of migration flows are a focus of public interest everywhere, this case could scarcely be more timely. Legislative framework. EU law. The directives relating to the award of public service contracts.
Derogations from the duty to conduct a procurement procedure. Special rules of EU law for passports and identity cards. The designation of the authorities and bodies authorised to have access to the data contained in the storage medium of documents is a matter of national legislation, subject to any relevant provisions of Community law, EU law or international agreements.
In accordance with the procedure referred to in Article 5 2 [ 7 ] it may be decided that the specifications referred to in Article 2 [ 8 ] shall be secret and not be published. In that case they shall be made available only to the bodies designated by the Member States as responsible for the printing and to persons duly authorised by a Member State or the Commission. Each Member State shall designate one body having responsibility for printing passports and travel documents.
It shall communicate the name of that body to the Commission and the other Member States. The same body may be designated by two or more Member States.
Each Member State shall be entitled to change its designated body. It shall inform the Commission and the other Member States thereof. National law. On the basis of the factual and legal situation as at 12 September , 10 the manufacture of chip passports, emergency passports, residence permits, identity cards, credit card-sized driving licences, credit card-sized vehicle licences and fireworks display permits is entrusted to Staatsdruckerei.
Under Paragraph 6 2 of that law, Staatsdruckerei is required to take all security measures necessary to prevent abuse in connection with the manufacture, processing and storage of security printing products.
Lastly, under Paragraph 6 3 of that law, Staatsdruckerei must grant the Federal Minister responsible for the security printing product in question, to the extent necessary for supervision, access to its business premises and an opportunity to inspect the relevant business records. Facts and pre-litigation procedure.
In its reply of 7 June , Austria relied on the protection of essential national security interests. Protection of secret information, safeguarding of the authenticity and veracity of the documents concerned, security of supply and guaranteed protection of sensitive data justified awarding the printing contracts exclusively to Staatsdruckerei, as Staatsdruckerei alone demonstrated the appropriate organisational, technical and structural security measures for performing those contracts.
By letters of 17 July and 28 March , Austria supplemented its arguments in this regard. On 10 July , the Commission issued a reasoned opinion. In that opinion, the Commission emphasised that it was perfectly possible to organise a public invitation to tender in such a way that only undertakings which specialised in the manufacture of documents subject to special security requirements and were supervised accordingly could be successful. Austria responded to the reasoned opinion on 10 September In essence, the Member State relied again on its national security interests and emphasised that the performance of the printing contracts was closely linked to public order and the institutional operation of the State.
Their direct award to Staatsdruckerei was justified by the need for a guaranteed supply and for production conditions which ensured compliance with special secrecy and security rules. Forms of order sought and procedure before the Court.
It claims that the Court should:. The action brought by the Commission was examined before the Court on the basis of the written documents and at the hearing on 7 June At the present stage, the subject matter of these infringement proceedings is now confined only to the manufacture of chip passports, emergency passports, identity cards, residence permits, credit card-sized driving licences, credit card-sized vehicle licences and fireworks display permits.
The action brought by the Commission is well founded if and in so far as certain requirements existed under EU law for the award of the printing contracts at issue see immediately below, section A , with which Austria failed to comply and which it could not evade by relying on essential national security interests see further below, section B.
Rather, Staatsdruckerei is an undertaking incorporated purely under private law and is wholly privately owned. Justice M. Arun Mishra,j. Sanjiv Khanna,J. Arun Mishra,J. Item Nos. Navin Sinha,J. Proximity Card whose photo is not clear on the card may get the card replaced immediately by new card. Chief Justices Court listed on Chamber matters to be taken up at 12 Noon by Honble Justice U.
Lalit in Court No. Further Court No. Item No listed in Court No 4 will not be taken up for hearing on 16 August Arun Mishra J. UOI and Anr. Achary, Additional Registrar is deputed as vacation officer.
Advocates is received, may be listed before Vacation Bench in between Consent to be given by tomorrow i. Justice J. Board of Examiners for the Advocate-on-Record Exam. Vacation Officer for month of June, Deepak Gupta, J on behalf of Hon. Madan B. Lokur, J. Rohinton Fali Nariman and Hon.
Deepak Gupta,JJ. Arun Mishra, J. Kurian Joseph,J. Justice Kurian Joseph on Adarsh Kumar Goel,J. Take further notice reg. Chamber matters Special Bench for hearing of cases pertaining to the Motor Accident Claims Subject Category compensation matters on Chelameswar, J. Deepak Gupta, J. In Chambers in Court No. CA No. Abdul Nazeer, J. SLP c No. Agrawal, J. Matters will now be taken up on Order dt. Court on Regular Hearing Days w.
State of U. Further, chamber matters will be taken up by Hon'ble L. Nageswara Rao, J at 12 noon in Court No. Nageswara Rao, J. Justice N. Further, Court No. Information of members of the Bar Assoc. Abdul Nazeer in Court No. Abdul Nazeer will not be taken up. SLP C D. State of Goa will be listed on 8. Justice Amitava Roy stand Deleted.
Pant, JJ. Accordingly, Original Suit No. CC No. Justice S. Abdul Nazeer Chambers in Court No. Bobde and Honble Dr. The C. It shall resume sitting on Appeal No. Chelameswar and Hon'ble S. Abdul Nazeer, JJ. M today - Jul R. CRL NO.
0コメント